Project Support in AMEISE: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The analysis of previous simulation runs shows,that trainees who have not performed project planning,achieved worse results than trainees who planned the project before the simulation run. | The analysis of previous simulation runs shows, that trainees who have not performed project planning, achieved worse results than trainees who planned the project before the simulation run. | ||
====Project Planning==== | ====Project Planning==== | ||
{{Box1|Therefore the project should be planned before executing a simulation run. | {{Box1|Therefore the project should be planned before executing a simulation run. The project design is intended to include the sequence of actions to be undertaken in the project and include an appropriate workforce planning.}} | ||
However, a careful planning of the project is only possible after starting the simulation run because from this point on the trainee gets relevant information(costs,employee skills) about the | However, a careful planning of the project is only possible after starting the simulation run because from this point on the trainee gets relevant information (costs, employee skills) about the simulation run. The AMEISE-system provides also support information, that is available to trainees only after activities, what means that the student must have already done the work to get feedback from the support tools. | ||
Thereby, errors | Thereby, errors cannot be avoided, but the trainee is alerted to mistakes and can learn from it. The support of the trainee is not to prescribe a best practice, but it will be given guidance as to what activities would lead to an improvement of the current situation. | ||
====Common Mistakes==== | ====Common Mistakes==== | ||
The analysis of SESAM-/AMEISE-simulation runs has shown that the following mistakes are | The analysis of SESAM-/AMEISE-simulation runs has shown that the following mistakes are committed very often: | ||
* '''Objectives are not | * '''Objectives are not fulfilled''' | ||
** The students have a big problem to | ** The students have a big problem to fulfill all objectives of the project. | ||
* '''Employee Utilization''' | * '''Employee Utilization''' | ||
** It is a great problem for most students, to occupy their employees constantly. | ** It is a great problem for most students, to occupy their employees constantly. Therefore employees are often without an activity over a long period, but continue to earn money. | ||
* '''Checking - and corrective actions are missing or only partially carried out''' | * '''Checking - and corrective actions are missing or only partially carried out''' | ||
** Many trainees forget about the necessary checking -and corrective actions of | ** Many trainees forget about the necessary checking -and corrective actions of individual phases during the project. This leads to bad results. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
====Support Tools==== | ====Support Tools==== | ||
New components were integrates in the AMEISE-system, to reduce this errors and | New components were integrates in the AMEISE-system, to reduce this errors and support the trainees. Two options of '''Support Tools''' are available: | ||
Advisor | Advisor | ||
Friendly Peer | Friendly Peer | ||
The | The instructor decides, if these support tools are available during the simulation run. | ||
====Overview==== | ====Overview==== | ||
The advisor is a '''passive''' support tool and has to be questioned by the trainee. Therefore the advisor assumes the role of the | The advisor is a '''passive''' support tool and has to be questioned by the trainee. Therefore the advisor assumes the role of the instructor and answers relevant questions during the simulation run. The friendly-peer is an '''active''' support tool and indicates the trainee if a difficult situation appears. The friendly-peer assumes the role of an experienced colleague who gives advices to trainees. | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 6 May 2013
The analysis of previous simulation runs shows, that trainees who have not performed project planning, achieved worse results than trainees who planned the project before the simulation run.
Project Planning
| Therefore the project should be planned before executing a simulation run. The project design is intended to include the sequence of actions to be undertaken in the project and include an appropriate workforce planning. |
However, a careful planning of the project is only possible after starting the simulation run because from this point on the trainee gets relevant information (costs, employee skills) about the simulation run. The AMEISE-system provides also support information, that is available to trainees only after activities, what means that the student must have already done the work to get feedback from the support tools.
Thereby, errors cannot be avoided, but the trainee is alerted to mistakes and can learn from it. The support of the trainee is not to prescribe a best practice, but it will be given guidance as to what activities would lead to an improvement of the current situation.
Common Mistakes
The analysis of SESAM-/AMEISE-simulation runs has shown that the following mistakes are committed very often:
- Objectives are not fulfilled
- The students have a big problem to fulfill all objectives of the project.
- Employee Utilization
- It is a great problem for most students, to occupy their employees constantly. Therefore employees are often without an activity over a long period, but continue to earn money.
- Checking - and corrective actions are missing or only partially carried out
- Many trainees forget about the necessary checking -and corrective actions of individual phases during the project. This leads to bad results.
Support Tools
New components were integrates in the AMEISE-system, to reduce this errors and support the trainees. Two options of Support Tools are available:
Advisor Friendly Peer
The instructor decides, if these support tools are available during the simulation run.
Overview
The advisor is a passive support tool and has to be questioned by the trainee. Therefore the advisor assumes the role of the instructor and answers relevant questions during the simulation run. The friendly-peer is an active support tool and indicates the trainee if a difficult situation appears. The friendly-peer assumes the role of an experienced colleague who gives advices to trainees.
